<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Emergent Grammar of Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philippmueller.de/the-emergent-grammar-of-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/the-emergent-grammar-of-twitter/</link>
	<description>www.philippmueller.de</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violetta</title>
		<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/the-emergent-grammar-of-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Violetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=553#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 has some postmodernist ideas in its grammar, therefore, going back to the philosophy of Derrida, Bourdieu and others may make sense..
...which leads me to another thought: isn&#039;t the whole Web 2.0 debate constantly returning us to the things we/history knew before? Kevin Kelly wrote about neo-socialism, here comes neo-postmodernism? what&#039;s next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 has some postmodernist ideas in its grammar, therefore, going back to the philosophy of Derrida, Bourdieu and others may make sense..<br />
&#8230;which leads me to another thought: isn&#8217;t the whole Web 2.0 debate constantly returning us to the things we/history knew before? Kevin Kelly wrote about neo-socialism, here comes neo-postmodernism? what&#8217;s next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

