<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sketching a Planetary Public Policy Approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/</link>
	<description>www.philippmueller.de</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinka Grosse</title>
		<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinka Grosse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=955#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>I actually believe that by now, people grow up thinking globally. Many don&#039;t  even face the problem of needing to rid themselves of thinking in national borders only, because their digital world does not know these limitations. Thus, joint-problem solving should become much more natural for future generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually believe that by now, people grow up thinking globally. Many don&#8217;t  even face the problem of needing to rid themselves of thinking in national borders only, because their digital world does not know these limitations. Thus, joint-problem solving should become much more natural for future generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofia Elizondo</title>
		<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia Elizondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=955#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I agree with your three areas of focus Philipp.  I think that is a great description of the “what” of planetary public policy.  

They made me think about the “how” of conducting such planetary public policy.  

Global institutions such as the OECD, EU, UN, WTO… etc. are comforting patterns of governance that we are all familiar with.  National and local congresses, parliaments, councils all look like the structure of these global organizations.  But as complexity increases I think the only robust channel for planetary exchange will be self-organized like-minded groups.  Open source is a great non-govermental example.  (Can you think of good governmental examples of these types of networks?) Linked through technology in tight or dispersed networks, I think this form of organization will in time, become more resilient and effective form of policy-generation than the more rigid planetary structures we have put in place.   Networks like these can identify (global problems), exchange information, (about local solutions), communicate (interculturally and globally), grow or recede with much more agility than pre-designed global structures.  Could the medium of conducting planetary public policy be networks of organic(self-organized) global groups?  Does it matter?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your three areas of focus Philipp.  I think that is a great description of the “what” of planetary public policy.  </p>
<p>They made me think about the “how” of conducting such planetary public policy.  </p>
<p>Global institutions such as the OECD, EU, UN, WTO… etc. are comforting patterns of governance that we are all familiar with.  National and local congresses, parliaments, councils all look like the structure of these global organizations.  But as complexity increases I think the only robust channel for planetary exchange will be self-organized like-minded groups.  Open source is a great non-govermental example.  (Can you think of good governmental examples of these types of networks?) Linked through technology in tight or dispersed networks, I think this form of organization will in time, become more resilient and effective form of policy-generation than the more rigid planetary structures we have put in place.   Networks like these can identify (global problems), exchange information, (about local solutions), communicate (interculturally and globally), grow or recede with much more agility than pre-designed global structures.  Could the medium of conducting planetary public policy be networks of organic(self-organized) global groups?  Does it matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=955#comment-417</guid>
		<description>I completely agree! And have to admit that as the text stands right now, it is not free of technocratic or Western biases... The third dimension &quot;a platform for inter-civilizational discourse&quot; at least hints at the solution that you have outlined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree! And have to admit that as the text stands right now, it is not free of technocratic or Western biases&#8230; The third dimension &#8220;a platform for inter-civilizational discourse&#8221; at least hints at the solution that you have outlined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Martínez</title>
		<link>http://www.philippmueller.de/sketching-a-planetary-public-policy-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Martínez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=955#comment-416</guid>
		<description>one of the reasons comparative politics were not-so-sexy was the fact that it tried to fix every problem and phenomenon into the Western perspective, at least at its early days. with the flow of information we can share at this point, and the possibility to place representatives of the same problem from different latitudes to discuss and deliberate, i think we are at an excellent moment to rethink many of the assumptions we did last century about the limits of this approach to public policy analysis from the comparative perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the reasons comparative politics were not-so-sexy was the fact that it tried to fix every problem and phenomenon into the Western perspective, at least at its early days. with the flow of information we can share at this point, and the possibility to place representatives of the same problem from different latitudes to discuss and deliberate, i think we are at an excellent moment to rethink many of the assumptions we did last century about the limits of this approach to public policy analysis from the comparative perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

