http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/ www.philippmueller.de Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-312 sadfasd Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:47:58 +0000 http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=469#comment-312 This is my first time comment at your blog.<br>Good recommended website.|*|wow <a href="http://gold%7C*%7Chttp://www.wotlkgold.net" rel="nofollow">gold|*|http://www.wotlkgold.net</a> This is my first time comment at your blog.
Good recommended website.|*|wow gold|*|http://www.wotlkgold.net

]]> http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-233 Alexander Hunziker Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:56:24 +0000 http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=469#comment-233 Yes, Sebastian, the one size fits all thinking is the problem. We should ask: Under what circumstances does this mode of governance yield better results than in any other mode. Yes, Sebastian, the one size fits all thinking is the problem. We should ask: Under what circumstances does this mode of governance yield better results than in any other mode.

]]> http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-1676 Alexander Hunziker Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:56:00 +0000 http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=469#comment-1676 Yes, Sebastian, the one size fits all thinking is the problem. We should ask: Under what circumstances does this mode of governance yield better results than in any other mode. Yes, Sebastian, the one size fits all thinking is the problem. We should ask: Under what circumstances does this mode of governance yield better results than in any other mode.

]]> http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-229 Sebastian Haselbeck Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:22:37 +0000 http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=469#comment-229 I don't think it's the "second-best" solution, but rather something we consider a one-size-fits all approach, while we sometimes make the mistake and forget that radical transparency works only in environments that are already prone to be transparent in the first place. That's also why most of the modern governance frameworks we ponder about are derived from such environments as the open source software community, these are highly transparent, collaborative and democratic microcosms, whereas the evironments we WISH would employ radical transparency would quickly get into lots of trouble, such as national security (do we want those torture memos on the web?) or corporate decision making (do you really want to know why you were fired?) etc... I think radical transparency is too often a stretch goal, and as such it's not too shabby I'd say, yet it's implementation is where we should work on. if we can achieve more democractic accountability with only half the transparency we aim at, we might not even need the radical version of it. transparency can't be an end in itself, it's a means. if we confuse the two, we end up focusing on creating more and more transparency without gaining the ability to do reach something with it. I don’t think it’s the “second-best” solution, but rather something we consider a one-size-fits all approach, while we sometimes make the mistake and forget that radical transparency works only in environments that are already prone to be transparent in the first place. That’s also why most of the modern governance frameworks we ponder about are derived from such environments as the open source software community, these are highly transparent, collaborative and democratic microcosms, whereas the evironments we WISH would employ radical transparency would quickly get into lots of trouble, such as national security (do we want those torture memos on the web?) or corporate decision making (do you really want to know why you were fired?) etc… I think radical transparency is too often a stretch goal, and as such it’s not too shabby I’d say, yet it’s implementation is where we should work on. if we can achieve more democractic accountability with only half the transparency we aim at, we might not even need the radical version of it. transparency can’t be an end in itself, it’s a means. if we confuse the two, we end up focusing on creating more and more transparency without gaining the ability to do reach something with it.

]]> http://www.philippmueller.de/radical-transparency-as-the-management-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-1675 Sebastian Haselbeck Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:22:00 +0000 http://www.philippmueller.de/?p=469#comment-1675 I don't think it's the "second-best" solution, but rather something we consider a one-size-fits all approach, while we sometimes make the mistake and forget that radical transparency works only in environments that are already prone to be transparent in the first place. That's also why most of the modern governance frameworks we ponder about are derived from such environments as the open source software community, these are highly transparent, collaborative and democratic microcosms, whereas the evironments we WISH would employ radical transparency would quickly get into lots of trouble, such as national security (do we want those torture memos on the web?) or corporate decision making (do you really want to know why you were fired?) etc... I think radical transparency is too often a stretch goal, and as such it's not too shabby I'd say, yet it's implementation is where we should work on. if we can achieve more democractic accountability with only half the transparency we aim at, we might not even need the radical version of it. transparency can't be an end in itself, it's a means. if we confuse the two, we end up focusing on creating more and more transparency without gaining the ability to do reach something with it. I don’t think it’s the “second-best” solution, but rather something we consider a one-size-fits all approach, while we sometimes make the mistake and forget that radical transparency works only in environments that are already prone to be transparent in the first place. That’s also why most of the modern governance frameworks we ponder about are derived from such environments as the open source software community, these are highly transparent, collaborative and democratic microcosms, whereas the evironments we WISH would employ radical transparency would quickly get into lots of trouble, such as national security (do we want those torture memos on the web?) or corporate decision making (do you really want to know why you were fired?) etc… I think radical transparency is too often a stretch goal, and as such it’s not too shabby I’d say, yet it’s implementation is where we should work on. if we can achieve more democractic accountability with only half the transparency we aim at, we might not even need the radical version of it. transparency can’t be an end in itself, it’s a means. if we confuse the two, we end up focusing on creating more and more transparency without gaining the ability to do reach something with it.

]]>